Loading...

Can we prove the second part of the Rhombus Postulate?

Now we can prove statement 2: If each diagonal bisects a pair of opposite angles, then the parallelogram is a rhombus. If we can do this, then we know our iff postulate is true.

diagonal bisects

Given: In parallelogram ABCD, AC bisects ∠A and ∠C.

Prove: Parallelogram ABCD is a rhombus.

Click through the tabs below to see how this statement can be proven.

Is it a Rhombus?

Your Turn

Prove that parallelogram ABCD is a rhombus.

By definition of parallelogram, ∠A = ∠C because opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent.
By definition of bisect, ∠a1 = ∠a2 and ∠c1 = ∠c2.
It follows that ∠a1 = ∠c1 and ∠a2= ∠c2 because if two congruent angles are bisected, the angles created by the bisection are congruent as well.
By the transitive property ∠a1 = ∠a2 = ∠c1 = ∠c2.
Sides opposite congruent angles are congruent as well. Therefore, AB \(\small\mathsf{\cong}\) BC \(\small\mathsf{\cong}\) AD \(\small\mathsf{\cong}\) DC.
Because all sides are congruent, parallelogram ABCD is a rhombus.

Use the previous proof as an example to create your own.

Given: In parallelogram ABCD, BD bisects ∠B and ∠D.

Prove: Parallelogram ABCD is a rhombus.

diagonal bisects

Create your proof by placing the steps below in the correct order.

Because all sides are congruent, parallelogram ABCD is a rhombus.

It follows that ∠b1 = ∠d2 and ∠b2= ∠d1 because if two congruent angles are bisected, the angles created by the bisection are congruent as well.

By definition of bisect, ∠b1 = ∠b2 and ∠d1 = ∠d2.

Sides opposite congruent angles are congruent as well. Therefore, AB \(\small\mathsf{\cong}\) BC \(\small\mathsf{\cong}\) AD \(\small\mathsf{\cong}\) DC.

By the transitive property ∠b1 = ∠b2 = ∠d1 = ∠d2.

By definition of parallelogram, ∠B = ∠D because opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

Great job! You got them all!
The ones with X's are incorrect. Try again.